timevolt
Opening soon. Receipts and payments aren't open yet.
Timevolt / Bias audit summary published and candidate notice sent before an automated hiring tool is used
Algorithmic decisions

Preserve the exact published bias-audit summary and candidate-notice wording as separate records of an existing hiring-tool workflow.

Preserve the exact published bias-audit summary and candidate-notice wording as separate records of an existing hiring-tool workflow. Keep your original source records together, then date the exact files. It does not prove publication, delivery, receipt, auditor independence, tool fairness, valid audit scope or that notice and audit duties were met.

Try a file locally

Your photos and files stay on your device, so keep them.

EXAMPLE
Bias audit summary published and candidate notice sent before an automated hiring tool is used
1 Nov 2026
Authority time: 14:02 UTC · example
Bitcoin block time: 14:10 UTC · example
Last checked: 15:02 UTC · example
✓ Dated◆ Permanent
Now keep it safe: three things
  1. Keep your photos and files unedited. The receipt only matches the originals. Put them in an album such as “My records”.
  2. Save this receipt to your camera roll.

    Keep the receipt file too. The image is a handy copy; checking needs the file.

  3. Email it to yourself.Email it to myself

    Your mail app opens a draft. Attach your receipt image and receipt file. Don’t attach your photos or documents. Timevolt does not send it or know whether it was sent.

Your record, one step at a time.

Your photos and files stay on your device, so keep them.

Local preview: files are fingerprinted here. Notes and progress stay in this browser. Keep downloaded copies; browser storage is not a backup.

0 items
How?

Add the exact original files for this part of the record. Keep them unchanged; a different export or edit has a different fingerprint.

Add link and screenshots

The link is recorded, not fetched or verified.

    0 items
    How?

    Record the date, time, place and who you spoke to. New notes are saved separately rather than editing an old note.

    How to keep notes that hold up
    Write it down

    By making a receipt you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. The Bitcoin record is permanent.

      By making a receipt you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. The Bitcoin record is permanent.

      How to keep notes that hold up

      Write notes as soon as you can. Keep the original account rather than replacing it later; the venue decides what weight it gets.

      1. Write it down straight away, on paper or in the box on a step.
      2. Put the date, time and place at the top, and who you spoke to.
      3. Use their words where you can; separate what you saw from what you were told.
      4. Sign or initial a paper note, photograph it and add the photo.
      5. Never edit an old note. Add a new dated entry when something changes. A device save time is not independent time evidence or proof of event order.
      Bias audit summary published and candidate notice sent before an automated hiring tool is used
      Bias audit summary published and candidate notice sent before an automated hiring tool is used

      01 · Keep the exact files

      Keep the original files for bias audit summary published and candidate notice sent before an automated hiring tool is used. Include any existing photos, signed records and source-system exports.

      Records to keep: Hash of the audit summary page and the notice text

      Bias audit summary published and candidate notice sent before an automated hiring tool is used

      02 · Date the file’s code

      Your device fingerprints the selected file or manifest. Dated follows an independent timestamp; Permanent follows Bitcoin anchoring.

      An independent time, tied to the exact bytes.

      Bias audit summary published and candidate notice sent before an automated hiring tool is used

      03 · Keep the evidence

      Keep the original files and complete receipt separately, alongside any existing venue, signature and workflow records.

      Keep the originals too. A changed or compressed copy has a different fingerprint.

      Try a file. It stays here.

      Make a test receipt on this device.

      By making a receipt you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. The Bitcoin record is permanent.

      or drop a file here

      Related cases

      Related cases from nearby fields. We don’t claim a time receipt would have changed the result.

      US Northern District of California · 2024

      An early hiring case does not prove bias

      Related: automated screening bias claims

      A job seeker claimed a hiring tool unfairly blocked people by race, age or disability. The judge kept unfair-effects claims but dropped claims of bias on purpose and the job-agency theory. One state claim could be rewritten; bias had not been proved.

      Summarized on Oct 29, 2026

      Read the source ›
      US federal Eastern District of New York · 2023

      Keep settlement duties tied to their stated triggers

      Related: age screening settlement duties

      Officials said software screened out older job seekers, which the firms denied. A court deal required notices to bosses; more training, notices and reports were due only if US tutor hiring restarted. The deal made no finding of fault.

      Summarized on Oct 29, 2026

      Read the source ›

      What courts, schemes and regulators say.

      Positions below refer to the cited rule or record type, not endorsement of Timevolt. This service is not represented as an eIDAS qualified timestamp provider. A non-qualified timestamp does not receive the qualified timestamp presumption.

      Needs something else · US New York City; covered employers and employment agencies

      DCWP Local Law 144 of 2021 official overview

      Covered use requires a bias audit within one year, publicly available audit information and the required notices; actual tool and job-location scope must be assessed using the guidance.

      The duty concerns an audit, public information and notice, not possession of a timestamp. A private saved page does not establish public availability.

      Source summary as of 2026-10-29. Check the current source and applicable local rules.

      Read the source
      Needs something else · US New York City; covered uses and NYC-resident candidates/employees

      DCWP FAQ notice and publication guidance

      FAQ describes the summary and tool distribution date publication, and notice ten business days before use to NYC-resident candidates/employees, with permitted website/job-posting/mail/email or policy routes depending on the audience.

      Only the stated local scope. A file date is not proof of sending, posting, delivery or ten-business-day timing in a particular process.

      Source summary as of 2026-10-29. Check the current source and applicable local rules.

      Read the source
      Needs something else · US New York City; independent-auditor requirement

      DCWP FAQ sections IV and V

      Auditor must exercise objective impartial judgment and meet independence limits; DCWP does not maintain a required approved-auditor list. Employer or employment agency remains responsible even when a vendor coordinates an audit.

      A receipt cannot verify auditor independence or shift responsibility. Providers listed as alternatives are prospects/services, not certified or approved by DCWP.

      Source summary as of 2026-10-29. Check the current source and applicable local rules.

      Read the source

      Other ways to do this

      Prices change. Check each provider’s site for current prices and service details.

      • Holistic AI

        Provides AI governance, bias testing and audit evidence.

        Visit site

      • BABL AI

        Provides independent AI audit and assurance services.

        Visit site

      • Optro AI Governance

        Organizes AI inventories and governance records.

        Visit site

      Related workflows.

      Quarterly user access review: the reviewer list, decisions and removals frozen as submittedAccess or license request, manager approval and grantQuarterly user access review: the list shown to the reviewer, each keep/remove decision and proof removals happenedHuman-in-the-loop approval before an AI agent executes a high-impact action (refund, payment instruction, production change, customer message)Who was physically present at a members' or condo board meetingHuman-made process record

      Proves / Doesn’t prove

      Proves

      A completed time receipt shows that the exact selected file existed by the independently witnessed time. You can check whether a later copy has the same bytes. It does not establish creation time, authorship, identity, event order, location or the truth of the contents.

      Doesn’t prove

      It does not prove publication, delivery, receipt, auditor independence, tool fairness, valid audit scope or that notice and audit duties were met.

      It does not prove publication, delivery, receipt, auditor independence, tool fairness, valid audit scope or that notice and audit duties were met.

      These are the bounds of a completed proof. The local tester does not establish any time. The chosen court, scheme or regulator decides what to accept.

      Questions, answered plainly.

      Your file stays on your device. During normal receipt creation, your device sends a randomized code made from its fingerprint, plus encrypted recovery data. It doesn't send the plain fingerprint or the random value that opens the code. Keep the original file and the complete receipt for checking. Privacy Policy.

      Does a dated audit summary mean the tool is fair?

      No. DCWP says the audit requirement does not replace separate anti-discrimination duties; a receipt adds no fairness decision.

      Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.

      Context for this answer
      Does a receipt prove the notice was sent?

      A completed time receipt shows that the exact selected file existed by the independently witnessed time. You can check whether a later copy has the same bytes. It does not establish creation time, authorship, identity, event order, location or the truth of the contents.

      Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.

      Context for this answer
      Is every AI hiring feature covered everywhere?

      No. The FAQ defines a covered tool and use in the city, including specified job-location and application conditions. These are NYC rules, not universal instructions.

      Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.

      Context for this answer
      Does DCWP approve the audit provider?

      The FAQ says the law does not require DCWP approval of auditors. Independence has its own requirements.

      Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.

      Context for this answer
      Did the opened screening-tool case find unlawful bias?

      No. The historical 2024 order let some claims continue and rejected others; it did not establish final discrimination or a NYC audit/notice violation.

      Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.

      Context for this answer

      The file tester runs on your device. It does not issue a timestamp or take a payment.

      Keep the records you already have.

      Keep your original files and any existing official records while the receipt service is being prepared.