0 items
How?
Use the exact existing record from your system. A file date does not verify its contents or the action it describes.
Add link and screenshots
The link is recorded, not fetched or verified.
enterprise
Keep the records that explain the sequence.
Order-of-events evidence — keep the records that explain the sequence. Each time receipt dates its own exact file; creation and event order require separate evidence.
Your photos and files stay on your device, so keep them.
EXAMPLE
Order proofs
1 Nov 2026
Authority time: 14:02 UTC · example
Bitcoin block time: 14:10 UTC · example
Last checked: 15:02 UTC · example
Bitcoin block time: 14:10 UTC · example
Last checked: 15:02 UTC · example
✓ Dated◆ Permanent
Now keep it safe: three things
- Keep your photos and files unedited. The receipt only matches the originals. Put them in an album such as “My records”.
- Save this receipt to your camera roll.
Keep the receipt file too. The image is a handy copy; checking needs the file.
- Email it to yourself.Email it to myself
Your mail app opens a draft. Attach your receipt image and receipt file. Don’t attach your photos or documents. Timevolt does not send it or know whether it was sent.
Your record, one step at a time.
Your photos and files stay on your device, so keep them.
Local preview: files are fingerprinted here. Notes and progress stay in this browser. Keep downloaded copies; browser storage is not a backup.
0 items
How?
Record the date, time, place and who you spoke to. New notes are saved separately rather than editing an old note.
How to keep notes that hold upWrite it down
By making a receipt you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. The Bitcoin record is permanent.
By making a receipt you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. The Bitcoin record is permanent.
How to keep notes that hold up
Write notes as soon as you can. Keep the original account rather than replacing it later; the venue decides what weight it gets.
- Write it down straight away, on paper or in the box on a step.
- Put the date, time and place at the top, and who you spoke to.
- Use their words where you can; separate what you saw from what you were told.
- Sign or initial a paper note, photograph it and add the photo.
- Never edit an old note. Add a new dated entry when something changes. A device save time is not independent time evidence or proof of event order.
Order proofs
Order proofs
01 · Keep the exact files
Keep exact versions of the consent, build, hold notice or access-removal record as each is created.
Use the source system’s own record.
Order proofs
02 · Date the file’s code
Your device fingerprints the selected file or manifest. Dated follows an independent timestamp; Permanent follows Bitcoin anchoring.
An independent time, tied to the exact bytes.
Order proofs
03 · Keep the evidence
Keep process logs linking consent to a call, approval to a deploy, a hold to deletion, or a leaver record to access removal.
Keep the originals too. A changed or compressed copy has a different fingerprint.
Try a file. It stays here.
Make a test receipt on this device.
By making a receipt you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. The Bitcoin record is permanent.
or drop a file here
Real cases: why the saved copy matters.
Real cases where dated records mattered. We don’t claim a time receipt would have changed the result.
US federal · 2016
Keep the order of permission and calls clear
A borrower challenged calls after he withdrew permission. The court kept the loan firm's win. Its account says later letters with his number gave permission again.
Unpublished appeal decision; supplied outcome and verification conflict about renewed consent, so this account follows the verification.
Summarized on Oct 29, 2026
Read the decision ›Related cases
What courts, schemes and regulators say.
Positions below refer to the cited rule or record type, not endorsement of Timevolt. This service is not represented as an eIDAS qualified timestamp provider. A non-qualified timestamp does not receive the qualified timestamp presumption.
Federal Rules of Evidence 902(13) and 902(14)
Electronic process output and copies of data can be authenticated by a qualified person's certification; hash values are the main example of 'digital identification'. The proponent must still give notice and the evidence must be relevant and not otherwise excluded.
Rule text read directly; hash values as the example of digital identification come from the 2017 committee note. Does not address timestamp authorities or Bitcoin anchoring; weight remains for the court.
Source summary as of 2026-10-28. Check the current source and applicable local rules.
Read the sourceeIDAS Regulation (EU) 910/2014, Art. 41
Electronic or nonqualified form alone is not a reason to deny a timestamp legal effect or admissibility. Other evidence requirements still apply. Article 41(2) addresses the qualified-timestamp presumption, and Article 42 its requirements; provider status alone is insufficient.
This describes the statutory evidence rule, not Timevolt qualification or a guarantee of admission. No claim about cross-border recognition is made here.
Source summary as of 2026-10-28. Check the current source and applicable local rules.
Read the sourceTCPA consent defense in federal courts
A federal district court held that consent to autodialed calls given by providing a number does not expire on its own and must be revoked; commentary advises callers to keep proof that customers supplied their numbers.
Courts discuss records and timing in general; none of the sources seen mention blockchain or RFC 3161 timestamps specifically.
Source summary as of 2026-10-28. Check the current source and applicable local rules.
Read the sourceFinancial Ombudsman Service
Where an insurer relies on a fraud condition it should base the decision on robust evidence; here the ombudsman accepted photo metadata dates, together with other points, as supporting the insurer's decision.
Shows why an independent time source for a photo matters; the FOS states no position on timestamp receipts.
Source summary as of 2026-10-28. Check the current source and applicable local rules.
Read the sourceOther ways to do this
Prices change. Check each provider’s site for current prices and service details.
Related workflows.
Proves / Doesn’t prove
Proves
A completed time receipt shows that the exact selected file existed by the independently witnessed time. You can check whether a later copy has the same bytes. It does not establish creation time, authorship, identity, event order, location or the truth of the contents.
Doesn’t prove
It does not show who created either record, that the person actually consented or approved, that the record was shown or acted on, that its content is true, or how a court, auditor or regulator will weigh it. "Existed by" is a ceiling on time, not the moment of the event.
Two existence-by timestamps do not establish event order. Independent time bounds and separate process evidence are needed to assess the order.
These are the bounds of a completed proof. The local tester does not establish any time. The chosen court, scheme or regulator decides what to accept.
Questions, answered plainly.
Your file stays on your device. During normal receipt creation, your device sends a randomized code made from its fingerprint, plus encrypted recovery data. It doesn't send the plain fingerprint or the random value that opens the code. Keep the original file and the complete receipt for checking. Privacy Policy.
What is an order proof?
Keep receipts beside the source records used to assess a sequence. Each receipt supplies an existence-by bound for its own exact file. Two such upper bounds alone do not establish relative creation time or event order. Keep separate event, approval and signature evidence; no automated order-check service is enabled here.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerDoes the receipt show when the event actually happened?
A completed time receipt shows that the exact selected file existed by the independently witnessed time. You can check whether a later copy has the same bytes. It does not establish creation time, authorship, identity, event order, location or the truth of the contents.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerDo you see or store our files?
Your file stays on your device. During normal receipt creation, your device sends a randomized code made from its fingerprint, plus encrypted recovery data. It doesn't send the plain fingerprint or the random value that opens the code. Keep the original file and the complete receipt for checking.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerWhy not just rely on our own logs or file dates?
Independent file timestamps supply existence-by bounds, not event order. Keep the original approval, artifact identity, deployment-system logs and independent process evidence. An earlier receipt date alone cannot establish that approval preceded deployment. No automated order-check connector is enabled here.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerWill a court or auditor accept it?
Electronic or nonqualified form alone is not a reason to deny a timestamp legal effect or admissibility. Other evidence requirements still apply. Article 41(2) addresses the qualified-timestamp presumption, and Article 42 its requirements; provider status alone is insufficient.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerDoes a receipt prove the person really consented or approved?
A completed time receipt shows that the exact selected file existed by the independently witnessed time. You can check whether a later copy has the same bytes. It does not establish creation time, authorship, identity, event order, location or the truth of the contents.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerHow do I prove an approval came before a deployment?
Independent file timestamps supply existence-by bounds, not event order. Keep the original approval, artifact identity, deployment-system logs and independent process evidence. An earlier receipt date alone cannot establish that approval preceded deployment. No automated order-check connector is enabled here.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerWhat does it cost and can I automate it?
See the Pricing page for current US-dollar plans and allowances. Fast is paused. Purchases open when receipts open.
Source summary as of October 30, 2026. Check the current source and its scope.
Context for this answerThe file tester runs on your device. It does not issue a timestamp or take a payment.
Keep the records you already have.
Keep your original files and any existing official records while the receipt service is being prepared.